Re: [ANN] 0.6.2 Beta #1 of the W3C Markup Validator

* Nicolas Roeser wrote:
>I meant that if an otherwise valid page only lacks a DOCTYPE
>declaration, it will be valid after validation, so we need to make clear
>that it would not be valid without fallback to using a DOCTYPE
>declaration.

Is 

  http://validator.w3.org:8001/check?uri=www.bjoernsworld.de/temp/nodoctype.html

sufficient?