RE: Checker isn't valid HTML

Got it--but your URL didn't work for me.  Apparently I'm not allowed to that
port (just a guess).

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fvalidator.w3.org%3A8001%2Fche
ck

That one checks the new validator output using the old validator, and it
passes (since the old validator can reach the new one and I can't).

Glen Starrett

-----Original Message-----
From: Ville Skyttä [mailto:ville.skytta@iki.fi]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 10:33 AM
To: Glen Starrett
Cc: www-validator@w3.org
Subject: Re: Checker isn't valid HTML


On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 19:34, Glen Starrett wrote:
> Try checking the output from http://validator.w3.org/check with
> itself... even the "error, no parameters" page will produce HTML
> without character encoding, and won't pass itself.  Seems a bit ironic
> that even the standards website doesn't meet the standards...
>
> Thought you should know (and could use a laugh).

We did and fixed it some time ago, the current beta release doesn't have
this problem:
<http://validator.w3.org:8001/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fvalidator.w3.org%3A8001
%2Fcheck>

--
\/ille Skyttä
ville.skytta at iki.fi