W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > April 2003

RE: Validation issues

From: Clark Alexander <clark@clarkandlucina.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 22:15:51 -0400
To: "'Bjoern Hoehrmann'" <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Cc: <www-validator@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000001c302f5$021d3ee0$9964a8c0@me>

Not that I know what #PCDATA children are, but thanks. What's the
reference for that? However, wouldn't that not conflict with the goals
of xhtml? That is to reformulate html so that it is consistent with
well-formed xml? That doesn't appear to be well formed. While I
understand that xhtml transitional was pretty tolerant, I was under the
impression that was fairly limited to merely allowing deprecated
elements and attributes.
Clark

-----Original Message-----
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann [mailto:derhoermi@gmx.net] 
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 22:10
To: Clark Alexander
Cc: www-validator@w3.org
Subject: Re: Validation issues


* Clark Alexander wrote:
>I'd be happy to. http://ict.neit.edu/calexander/Untitled1.html
>The text isn't inside a block element at all.

<body> allows #PCDATA children in XHTML 1.0 Transitional, you might mix
this up with XHTML 1.0 Strict.
Received on Monday, 14 April 2003 22:20:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:08 GMT