W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > October 2002

Re: Beta: Doctype override and valid documents

From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 22:00:56 +0100
To: W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>
cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Message-ID: <a01060005-1021-AF40B486EC4A11D6A2D300039300CF5C@[]>

Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote:

>>>Second, yes, the page would validate es XHTML 1.0 Strict, but who
>>>cares about that? It has a XHTML 1.0 Transitional document type
>>>declaration and I selected "override" to XHTML 1.0 Transitional, so
>Seems like you missed this one, it says "Strict" while it must say

Right. I found that one. It was a case of excessive optimization. It's
fixed in CVS and will be iin the next beta.

We've gotten to a point where a human-readable,  human-editable text format
forstructured data has become a complex nightmare where somebody can safely
say "As many threads on xml-dev have shown, text-based processing of XML is
hazardous at best" and be perfectly valid in saying it.     -- Tom Bradford
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2002 16:01:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 14:17:35 UTC