W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > November 2002

Re: The beta validator

From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 22:46:40 +0100
To: W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>
cc: elfin <elfin@lspace.org>
Message-ID: <A01060006-1022-8F2839FBF81A11D691BA00039300CF5C@[193.157.66.10]>

Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@iki.fi> wrote:

>
>On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 15:16, elfin wrote:
>
>>Whilst testing a page for xhtml 1 strict compliance I noticd it didn't
>>pick up some unescaped &'s whereas the 'public' validator picked them
>>up.
>
>Whoo.  Looks like you're right.  Here's a couple of sample pages:
>
><http://koti.welho.com/vskytta/foo.html>
><http://koti.welho.com/vskytta/foo2.html>
>
>I'll go file a bug.

These are now reported as Warnings even for Valid documents. Without
digging too deeply into this it appears as though bare amperstands are not
in fact invalid. I speculate that these do not introduce entity references
since entity references cannot be null. You do get warnings about them, but
only because the characters are significant to SGML.

I need to dig some more to find out whether this is actually a bug in
OpenSP.


-- 
If you believe that will stop spammers, you're sadly misled. Rusty hooks,
rectally administered fuel oil enemas, and the gutting of their machines,
*that* stops spammers!                                         -- Saundo
Received on Thursday, 14 November 2002 16:46:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:04 GMT