W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > November 2002

Re: Beta: application/xhtml+xml vs. HTML documents

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 20:11:44 +0100
To: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
Cc: W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>
Message-ID: <3e1121f7.520434685@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>

* Terje Bless wrote:
>Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote:
>>  http://www.bjoernsworld.de/temp/xhtml-html.xhtml is
>>application/xhtml+xml delivered valid HTML 2.0 document:
>>  <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN">
>>  <title//
>>  <p>...
>>The Validator says "This Page Is NOT Valid HTML 2.0!" as a result of
>>using the SGML parser in XML mode [...]
>Thanks, I've logged this but don't think we'll do anything about it least
>for this version. In a sense it _is_ invalid as all valid document types to
>send as app/xhtml+xml are XML based.

It is invalid XML, but not invalid HTML 2.0. Just don't recognize HTML
FPIs for application/xhtml+xml and thus avoid the result bar.
Received on Saturday, 2 November 2002 14:11:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 14:17:35 UTC