W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > July 2002

Re: HTTP Expire Header for /check/referer

From: Lloyd Wood <l.wood@eim.surrey.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:13:53 +0100 (BST)
To: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
cc: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>, Mikael Lind <z94lind@mtek.chalmers.se>, <www-validator@w3.org>, <ot@w3.mag.keio.ac.jp>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.43.0207111208120.11046-100000@artemis.ee.surrey.ac.uk>

On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Terje Bless wrote:

> >> --
> >> I wished for 4 uncursed scrolls of gold detection
> >> and all I got was this lousy .signature
> >
> >On a pedantic note, that's not a valid .sig.

in fact, it's lousy, for the reason you state.


> And on a similarly pedantic note, you may want to mention /why/ it's not a
> valid signature while you're at it! :-)
> Mikael: The standard signature separator is "-- " (dash-dash-space) on a
> line by itself. You need that trailing space for it to be a valid signature
> separator. If you are using one of the email clients that will munge the
> signature separator (*cough*Microsoft Outlook Express*cough*) I suggest you
> seriously consider switching to one that won't; as these MUAs tend to have
> other problems too.

Received on Thursday, 11 July 2002 07:15:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:03 GMT