Liam Quinn wrote: > > On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Anita Hawkins wrote: > > > I know, I know, it's just one letter. But still, any site dealing with > > validation by URL should be able to spell "URL"! (It's spelled "URI" on both the > > feedback page http://validator.w3.org/feedback.html and on the main page > > http://validator.w3.org/ in bold caps, no less) > > The term "URI" is correct. See <http://www.w3.org/Addressing/>. > > -- > Liam Quinn But is it? If I supply a URN (qua URN) to the validator rather than a URL, I am told : HTML Validation Service Results Sorry, this type of URI is not supported by this service. URIs should be in the form: http://validator.w3.org/ (There are other types of URIs, too, but only http:// URIs are currently supported by this service.) Gerald Oskoboiny Last modified: Date: 2001/09/14 04:13:13 thus suggesting (to me, at least) that the Validator is /not/ capable of accepting URIs, but only (a fairly restricted set of) URLs. Philip Taylor, RHBNCReceived on Wednesday, 10 July 2002 07:32:05 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:03 GMT