On 12 Jan 2002, Simon Hill wrote: > On Sat, 2002-01-12 at 11:40, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > > * Simon Hill wrote: > > >the validator refuses to attempt XHTML when given the > > >application/xhtml+xml mime type... > > >can we please have this fixed? > > > > Sure, as soon as the application/xhtml+xml registration > > becomes an RFC and IANA registers that type. > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-baker-xhtml-media-reg-02.txt > isn't good enough? Individual draft. If it was adopted by an IETF WG it might be more convincing as something to start work towards... But really, RFC3023 already puts the +xml suffix convention on the standards track; that is more than enough to go on, given that application/xhtml is already supported. L. <L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk>PGP<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/>Received on Monday, 14 January 2002 05:30:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:00 GMT