W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > January 2002

Re: validator not doing application/xhtml+xml

From: Lloyd Wood <l.wood@eim.surrey.ac.uk>
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 17:03:09 +0000 (GMT)
To: Simon Hill <red_one@othersdietrying.com>
cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, <www-validator@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.43.0201131657590.13505-100000@phaestos.ee.surrey.ac.uk>
On 12 Jan 2002, Simon Hill wrote:

> On Sat, 2002-01-12 at 11:40, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> > * Simon Hill wrote:
> > >the validator refuses to attempt XHTML when given the
> > >application/xhtml+xml mime type...
> > >can we please have this fixed?
> >
> > Sure, as soon as the application/xhtml+xml registration
> > becomes an RFC and IANA registers that type.
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-baker-xhtml-media-reg-02.txt
> isn't good enough?

Individual draft. If it was adopted by an IETF WG it might be more
convincing as something to start work towards...

But really, RFC3023 already puts the +xml suffix convention on the
standards track; that is more than enough to go on, given that
application/xhtml is already supported.

L.

<L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk>PGP<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/>
Received on Monday, 14 January 2002 05:30:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:14:00 GMT