Hi Bjoern. On Wednesday, Dec 25, 2002, at 13:48 Asia/Tokyo, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > Why doesn't checklink qualify as a robot? My own definition of a robot is that it retrieves some data (the documents) or metadata (indexing). I may be wrong. In any case I don't think checklink, even in recursive mode, should follow the robots directives (noindex is irrelevant, and nofollow would make it useless...). I'm interested to hear opposite arguments, though. -- OlivierReceived on Wednesday, 25 December 2002 02:05:59 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:07 GMT