Next message: Lloyd Wood: "Re: useful QA gizmo: check popular docs for HTML validity"
Message-ID: <000601c148f2$47b34120$2689e041@home2>
From: "Gannon Dick" <gdick@gte.net>
To: <www-validator@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 09:23:14 -0500
Subject: Re: Machine readable format for validation results
May I suggest a XML RPC or it's SOAP cousin for XHTML or XML documents? That way you could explicitly validate with error return, or not as is your whim.
It should not be forgotten that the popularity of HTML and the web itself rests upon the **loose** syntax of HTML and mass produced invalid documents. You validate so you know you are doing it right, not because you have no 'right' to do it.