Next message: Samuel Rinnetmäki: "Machine readable format for validation results"
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 06:01:39 -0400
From: Gerald Oskoboiny <gerald@w3.org>
To: www-qa@w3.org, www-validator@w3.org
Message-ID: <20010929060139.A15926@w3.org>
Subject: Re: useful QA gizmo: check popular docs for HTML validity
I just noticed a couple mistakes in my previous message:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 04:41:51AM -0400, Gerald Oskoboiny wrote:
:
> our policy is not to change dated versions of documents in our
> TR space [1],
I meant "... our policy is to not change dated versions"
(hmm... now I'm splitting an infinitive; what's the right way
to phrase that, I wonder?)
> When we first ran this report against the documents on www.w3.org
> in September 1999, 20 of the top 53 documents on our site were
> invalid. In the most recent report (below), 20 of the top 449
> documents are valid,
that should be "... 20 of the top 449 documents are invalid".
--
Gerald Oskoboiny http://www.w3.org/People/Gerald/
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/
tel:+1-613-261-6630 mailto:gerald@w3.org