Re: Referer validation errors

From: Terje Bless (link@pobox.com)
Date: Tue, Sep 25 2001

  • Next message: Kynn Bartlett: "Re: Referer validation errors"

    From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
    To: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
    Cc: www-validator@w3.org
    Date: 25 Sep 2001 06:41:02 +0200
    Message-Id: <1001392863.28013.4.camel@tux>
    Subject: Re: Referer validation errors
    
    [  Testing a new email client. Yell if there are any problems. ]
    
    On Mon, 2001-09-24 at 20:25, Kynn Bartlett wrote:
    >  >This is what happens when a referer link to the validator is
    >  >followed by someone using a browser that does not send proper
    >  >referer information. It attempts to validate what is essentially
    >  >an empty document.
    >  >
    >  >Liz
    > 
    > Is Liz correct, and if so, why is this the behavior of the validator?
    
    AFAIK, this is not the behaviour of the Validator. It certainly isn't
    the _intended_ behaviour of the Validator. IOW, if this is truly how it
    behaves then it's a bug. If you can provide more details (exact URL and
    browser name+version+platform) I'll try to replicate it and, if
    necessary, fix it.
    
    
    > Should it do something different if there is not sufficient
    > information given to attempt validation?
    
    Yeah, it should. Our error handling is pretty disgracefull ATM. Fixing
    it is on the TODO, but I haven't got a round tuit yet.