Re: XHTML + <form ...> </form> BUG?

From: Nick Kew (nick@webthing.com)
Date: Sun, Sep 23 2001

  • Next message: Liam Quinn: "Re: XHTML + <form ...> </form> BUG?"

    Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 21:10:24 +0100 (BST)
    From: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
    To: Liam Quinn <liam@htmlhelp.com>
    cc: www-validator@w3.org
    Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0109232107010.570-100000@fenris.webthing.com>
    Subject: Re: XHTML + <form ...> </form> BUG?
    
    On Sun, 23 Sep 2001, Liam Quinn wrote:
    
    > > It seems to me that this error message is not ideal: why not revert
    > > to a message that lists the elements <input> can be contained in at
    > > this point?
    > 
    > Do you remember the old 'document type does not allow element "P" here;
    > missing one of "APPLET", "OBJECT", "MAP", "IFRAME", "BUTTON" start-tag'?
    
    My best attempt (as implemented at Site Valet) is
     "element %1 must be enclosed in one of %2"
    
    which in the above instance will expand %1 to input and %2 to
    div,p,pre,...
    
    -- 
    Nick Kew
    
    Site Valet - the essential service for anyone with a website.
    <URL:http://valet.webthing.com/>