Re: Trouble: ....document type...

From: Nick Kew (nick@webthing.com)
Date: Wed, Sep 19 2001

  • Next message: Nick Kew: "Re: checklink: 500"

    Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 13:10:57 +0100 (BST)
    From: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
    To: grandane@grandane.com
    cc: www-validator@w3.org
    Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0109191254170.425-100000@fenris.webthing.com>
    Subject: Re: Trouble: ....document type...
    
    
    
    On Sat, 15 Sep 2001 grandane@grandane.com wrote:
    
    > Am receiving "No errors found" but with message saying "This document
    > _would_ validate as the document type specified if 
    > updated  to match the Options used. "
    
    Aaargh!!!  Reports like this need a URL where we can see what's
    going on.
    
    > Have tried adding to my meta tags one of the explanations given by
    > validator i.e.,   <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
    > charset=utf-8"> .......
    
    Onono, don't say that bogosity has found its way into the validator
    pages?  You use HTTP headers to set Content-Type.  Use lynx -dump -head
    to see what actual HTTP headers your server is returning, and fix
    them if wrong.
    
    > Example:
    >             <?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
    >             For HTML, use the <meta> tag. Example:
    >             <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
    > charset=utf-8"> ........
    
    Any of which would be appropriate for a protocol (like FTP) that
    serves documents without MIME headers, or for reading a file from
    local disc.  But not for HTTP.
    
    > Advice very much needed.
    
    Tell us a URL!
    
    -- 
    Nick Kew
    
    Site Valet - the essential service for anyone with a website.
    <URL:http://valet.webthing.com/>