(No Subject)

From: Gladney Oakley (gladney@angelfire.com)
Date: Tue, Sep 18 2001

  • Next message: Bjoern Hoehrmann: "Re: Mysterious character encoding detection"

    Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 00:06:50 -0400 (EDT)
    To: www-validator@w3.org
    From: "Gladney Oakley" <gladney@angelfire.com>
    Message-ID: <OBGDNCFDLOLCBAAA@angelfire.com>
    Subject: (No Subject)
    
    
        gerald@w3.org
    
    Sir, 
     The new HTML Validation Service Results
    page is a fine improvement.
    
    However I did experience two difficulties:
    
    1) In the following diagnostic
    
          Line <a href="#line-294">294</a>, column 50:
    
        the 294 was correct but the column count was not ...
    	Here is the line as the Validator presented it
        <a name="line-294"> 294</a>:    &#60;/p&#62;&#60;P class=&#34;jm20&#34;&#62;Light of the Sanctuary, the Occult Diary of Geoffrey Hodson&#60;/strong&#62;
        more correctly here it is from my file
       </p><P class="jm20">Light of the Sanctuary, the Occult Diary of Geoffrey Hodson</strong>
    
    The following would have been correct
          Line <a href="#line-294">294</a>, column 83:
    
    ------------------------------
    
    2)   I have not used the terms offered to indicate a Character Encoding
         as among the 33 choices offered none are applicable.
    
         This official (and erroneous) quote
            "The two most obvious encodings store Unicode text as
             sequences of either 2 or 4 bytes sequences.  The official
             terms for these encodings are UCS-2 and UCS-4 respectively."
         will serve to introduce the problem ...
         I use Monobyte Unicode, I think UCS-1 is a fair name
    	 and neither this encoding nor this name are offered.
    
         Monobyte Unicode is simpler than UCS-n where n is greater than 1.
    
    	 I suggest that the following provides adequate signage:
    
         <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ucs-1">
    
         but leave the nomenclature problem to you, B-Lee and the W3 committees.
    
         A document encoded in UCS-1
         uses only the lower 128 code positions
    	 so it is easily readable by Unix, MacIntosh and WIntel machines 
         and there is no limit on the number of Glyphs that
    	 can be referenced.
    
         A document encoded in UCS-1
         has the additional property that it is backward compatible  with
    	 venerable software and operating systems.
    
         Unfortunately the "UCS" label is  associated with
         Multiple-Octet Coded sets, but that is not my concern
    	 and it is rectifiable by those who have made the mistake.
         UCS-1 is an essentially unused label and the character
    	 set/encoding which I use it to designate is robust.
    
         Perhaps
         <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ucs-1">
         will find acceptance by the W3 Validator one day. ?
    
         Perhaps you can suggest an improvement?
    
    sinxerely,
    
    Gladney Oakley
    
    
    
    Get 250 color business cards for FREE!
    http://businesscards.lycos.com/vp/fastpath/