Re: Bug : Validator doesn't "see" the </em> end tag

From: Norbert Bottlaender-Prier (nbp2@wanadoo.fr)
Date: Mon, Aug 20 2001

  • Next message: Peter K. Sheerin: "Re: Bug : Validator doesn't "see" the </em> end tag" 

    Message-ID: <3b816a2b3cdf9e4b@citronier.wanadoo.fr> (added by citronier.wanadoo.fr)
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 21:50:58 +0200
To: www-validator@w3.org
From: Norbert Bottlaender-Prier <nbp2@wanadoo.fr>
Subject: Re: Bug : Validator doesn't "see" the </em> end tag

Oh thanks, now i see... the usefulness of the "show-tree-option" ;-)

Rhetorical question anyway : is the DTD right in allowing <em> tags be 
nested ? I wonder what it means writing a text <em>emphasized, <em>more 
emphasized and <em>even more... %-)
*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*
  (o_    This was The Megabyte Text Magician - http://tmtm.free.fr
  //\               "Les peripheriques vous parlent"
  V_/_    http://www.globenet.org/periph    -    TUX powered  ;-)
*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*