Re: charset parameter

From: Terje Bless (link@pobox.com)
Date: Fri, Jul 27 2001

  • Next message: Nick Kew: "Re: --->Please make sure you specified the DOCTYPE properly"

    Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 10:59:43 +0200
    From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
    To: W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>
    Message-ID: <20010727110140-r01010700-a521c783-0910-010c@192.168.1.6>
    Subject: Re: charset parameter
    
    On 26.07.01 at 05:38, Terje Bless <link@pobox.com> wrote:
    
    >we will need a translated version of the Validator to be even remotely
    >usefull[1]. This might also include localizing it to assume S-JIS or Big5,
    >KOI8, or EUC_JP (etc.).
    >
    >None of these are ASCIIpadible enough to let us extract a meta element
    >AFAICT. It's no better to assume these then it is to assume ISO-Latin-1 by
    >way of the HTTP 1.1 defaulting rules.
    
    Actually, just ignore me, I'm talking out of my... :-)
    
    Those encodings are, according to XML 1.0SE, ASCIIpadible enough to get an
    XML Encoding Declaration and so they should be near enough that you can get
    a META element some significant fraction of the time.
    
    That's what I get for talking about things I have no head for at 5am. :-)