Wednesday, 1 August 2001
- Re: Warn about unknown parameters
- Re: Warn about unknown parameters
- Re: Warn about unknown parameters
- Re: Icon for XHTML 1.1
- Re: XHTML validation broken?
- Re: Warn about unknown parameters
Tuesday, 31 July 2001
Monday, 30 July 2001
Sunday, 29 July 2001
Saturday, 28 July 2001
Monday, 30 July 2001
- Re: --->Please make sure you specified the DOCTYPE properly
- Re: Problem with link checker when CSS validator is down
- Problem with link checker when CSS validator is down
Sunday, 29 July 2001
Saturday, 28 July 2001
- Re: charset parameter
- Re: charset parameter
- Re: Error Index / Summary
- Re: charset parameter
- Re: charset parameter
- Re: charset parameter
- Re: Error Index / Summary
- Re: charset parameter
- Re: charset parameter
- Re: Error Index / Summary
- Error Index / Summary
- Re: charset parameter
Friday, 27 July 2001
- Re: charset parameter
- Re: charset parameter
- Re: charset parameter
- Re: charset parameter
- Re: charset parameter
- Re: charset parameter
- Re: charset parameter
- Re: SVG badges
- Re: charset parameter
- Re: SVG badges
- Re: --->Please make sure you specified the DOCTYPE properly
- Re: --->Please make sure you specified the DOCTYPE properly
- Re: --->Please make sure you specified the DOCTYPE properly
- Re: --->Please make sure you specified the DOCTYPE properly
- Re: --->Please make sure you specified the DOCTYPE properly
- Re: charset parameter
- Re: charset parameter
- Re: charset parameter
Thursday, 26 July 2001
Friday, 27 July 2001
- Re: charset parameter
- Re: charset parameter
- Re: --->Please make sure you specified the DOCTYPE properly
- Re: SVG badges
- Re: Wither Wishlist Requests?
- Wither Wishlist Requests?
- Re: charset parameter
- SVG badges
Thursday, 26 July 2001
- Re: --->Please make sure you specified the DOCTYPE properly
- Re: charset parameter
- Re: charset parameter
- Re: charset parameter
- Re: --->Please make sure you specified the DOCTYPE properly
- --->Please make sure you specified the DOCTYPE properly
- Fwd: FYI: UTF-8 BOM is now official
- Re: charset parameter (fwd)
- Re: charset parameter (fwd)
- Re: charset parameter
- Re: (x)html validator broken?
- Re: checklink: sys/syscall.ph
Wednesday, 25 July 2001
Thursday, 26 July 2001
Sunday, 22 July 2001
Wednesday, 25 July 2001
Thursday, 26 July 2001
- Re: xml-stylesheet PI
- Re: Images in CVS
- Re: charset parameter
- Re: Update the news
- Re: charset parameter
- Re: charset parameter
- Re: charset parameter
Wednesday, 25 July 2001
- Images in CVS
- Re: xml-stylesheet PI
- Update the news
- Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML
- xml-stylesheet PI
- checklink: convert URIs to UTF-8
- Re: charset parameter
- Re: charset parameter
- Re: charset parameter
- Re: checklink: newsgroup links
- Re: charset parameter
- Re: charset parameter
- Re: charset parameter
Tuesday, 24 July 2001
- checklink: newsgroup links
- Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML
- Re: charset parameter
- Re: charset parameter
- Fw: Nested Element Problem
- Re: Nested Element Problem
- Nested Element Problem
- charset parameter
Monday, 23 July 2001
- Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML
- Re: DTD 4.01 for ignoring & in CGI URL
- Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML
- Re: DTD 4.01 for ignoring & in CGI URL
- Re: DTD 4.01 for ignoring & in CGI URL
- Re: DTD 4.01 for ignoring & in CGI URL
- Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML
- Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML
- Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML
- Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML
- Re: DTD 4.01 for ignoring & in CGI URL
- Re: DTD 4.01 for ignoring & in CGI URL
- Re: DTD 4.01 for ignoring & in CGI URL
- Re: DTD 4.01 for ignoring & in CGI URL
- Re: DTD 4.01 for ignoring & in CGI URL
- Re: DTD 4.01 for ignoring & in CGI URL
- Re: DTD 4.01 for ignoring & in CGI URL
- Re: DTD 4.01 for ignoring & in CGI URL
- DTD 4.01 for ignoring & in CGI URL
- Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML
Sunday, 22 July 2001
- Re: Producing an XML report from the validator
- Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML
- Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML
- Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML
- Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML
Saturday, 21 July 2001
- Re: [Tidy-dev] Re: Unknown Encoding - Post HTMLTidy wrap
- Re: Unknown Encoding - Post HTMLTidy wrap
- Re: HTML ID case question
- Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML
- Re: Validator compatibility
Friday, 20 July 2001
- Re: [Tidy-dev] Re: Unknown Encoding - Post HTMLTidy wrap
- Re: Unknown Encoding - Post HTMLTidy wrap
- Re: Incorrect "catch" of valid data
Thursday, 19 July 2001
- Re: Unknown Encoding - Post HTMLTidy wrap
- Re: Incorrect "catch" of valid data
- Re: Incorrect "catch" of valid data
- Unknown Encoding - Post HTMLTidy wrap
- Re: Incorrect "catch" of valid data
- Re: Invalid char refs in (X)HTML (was: Re: Incorrect "catch" of valid data)
- Re: Incorrect "catch" of valid data
- Re: Incorrect "catch" of valid data
- Re: A trailing dash in a domain name makes validator fail?
- Re: A trailing dash in a domain name makes validator fail?
- Re: Invalid char refs in (X)HTML (was: Re: Incorrect "catch" of valid data)
Wednesday, 18 July 2001
Thursday, 19 July 2001
- Re: Invalid char refs in (X)HTML (was: Re: Incorrect "catch" of valid data)
- Invalid char refs in (X)HTML (was: Re: Incorrect "catch" of valid data)
- Re: Incorrect "catch" of valid data
- Re: Incorrect "catch" of valid data
Wednesday, 18 July 2001
- Fwd: validator/httpd/cgi-bin check
- Re: A trailing dash in a domain name makes validator fail?
- Re: Incorrect "catch" of valid data
- Re: A trailing dash in a domain name makes validator fail?
- Re: A trailing dash in a domain name makes validator fail?
- Re: A trailing dash in a domain name makes validator fail?
- Re: A trailing dash in a domain name makes validator fail?
- A trailing dash in a domain name makes validator fail?
- Re: xhtml 1.1 logo
- Re[2]: xhtml 1.1 logo
- Re: changing format of image
- Re: Buffer overflow bug in Validator?
- Re: Icon for XHTML 1.1?
- Re: Invalid validation?
- Re: checklink: upload
- Re: xhtml 1.1 logo
- Re: Buffer overflow bug in Validator?
- Re: Can src of an iframe be just HTML fragments?
- checklink: upload
Tuesday, 17 July 2001
Monday, 16 July 2001
Tuesday, 17 July 2001
Monday, 16 July 2001
Sunday, 15 July 2001
Tuesday, 17 July 2001
Monday, 16 July 2001
- Re: CSS/XHTML Validators weirdness
- Re: Non-SGML Char Refs
- Re: HTML ID case question
- Re: XHTML1.1?
- Re: Non-SGML Char Refs
- Re: HTML ID case question
Sunday, 15 July 2001
- Re: CSS/XHTML Validators weirdness
- Re: HTML ID case question
- Re: CSS/XHTML Validators weirdness
- Re: Non-SGML Char Refs
- Re: Help with decoding error messages?
- Re: Validator Idea
- Re: HTML ID case question
- Re: € (was: link check)
- Re: Error in validator?
- Re: Whole Page Validate
- Re: Validator for Windows NT/2000 System
- Re: XHTML 1.1 support in validator.w3.org anytime soon?
Saturday, 14 July 2001
- Re: just a small thing
- Re: link check for mozilla.org fails with 404
- Re: link check for mozilla.org fails with 404
Friday, 13 July 2001
Saturday, 14 July 2001
Friday, 13 July 2001
- Re: [ICRA Meta vail to validate]
- ICRA Meta vail to validate
- Re: checklink:
- Re: problems with validator program?
Thursday, 12 July 2001
Friday, 13 July 2001
Thursday, 12 July 2001
- Re: HTML ID case question
- Re: HTML ID case question
- Re: HTML ID case question
- Re: HTML ID case question
Wednesday, 11 July 2001
- Validator compatibility
- Re: HTML ID case question
- Re: HTML ID case question
- Re: HTML ID case question
- Re: Form validation
- Form validation
Tuesday, 10 July 2001
- Fw: Re: referer seems broken..
- Re: referer seems broken..
- Re: Bug in the validator?
- Re: referer seems broken..
Monday, 9 July 2001
Saturday, 7 July 2001
Tuesday, 10 July 2001
Monday, 9 July 2001
- Re: W3W and Bobby Validation
- Re: W3W and Bobby Validation
- Re: W3W and Bobby Validation
- W3W and Bobby Validation
- Re: Error in validator?
Sunday, 8 July 2001
Saturday, 7 July 2001
- Re: W3C HTML Validation Service Results are failing on good pages
- Re: W3C HTML Validation Service Results are failing on good pages
- Re: W3C HTML Validation Service Results are failing on good pages
- Re: W3C HTML Validation Service Results are failing on good pages
- Re: image name/id
Friday, 6 July 2001
- W3C HTML Validation Service Results are failing on good pages
- image name/id
- Re: Error in validator?
- Re: Error in validator?
- Re: Error in validator?
- Re: German_Umlauts
Thursday, 5 July 2001
Wednesday, 4 July 2001
Tuesday, 3 July 2001
Monday, 2 July 2001
Sunday, 1 July 2001
Monday, 2 July 2001
- Re: German_Umlauts
- Re: 'align / width' attribute not valid
- 'align / width' attribute not valid
- Re: German_Umlauts
- Re: German_Umlauts
- Re: German_Umlauts