Next message: Tim Bagot: "Re: Minimized P valid XHTML?"
From: "Osmo Saarikumpu" <sendosmo@hotmail.com>
To: www-validator@w3.org
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 11:50:15
Message-ID: <LAW2-F146MC9slb7bOz00008279@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Minimized P valid XHTML?
>From: "Bertilo Wennergren" <bertilow@chello.se>
>The XML recommendation should set you straight:
>
> Empty-element tags may be used for any element which has no content,
> whether or not it is declared using the keyword EMPTY. For
>interoperability,
> the empty-element tag should be used, and should only be used, for
>elements
> which are declared EMPTY.
>
><http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#sec-starttags>
Well, it certainly clears my problem by narrowing and it to an exact
question. So, to clarify:
a) according XML 1.0 <colgroup /> is valid (may be used)
b) according to XHTML 1.0 <colgroup /> is not valid (must not be used)
and the question: which recommendation rules for a xhtml 1 Transitional
document?
os
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.