RE: Better browsing

From: Bertilo Wennergren (bertilow@hem.passagen.se)
Date: Thu, Mar 01 2001

  • Next message: Kathleen Anderson: "Character set validation"

    From: "Bertilo Wennergren" <bertilow@hem.passagen.se>
    To: <www-validator@w3.org>
    Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 16:56:39 +0100
    Message-ID: <HBECLJECMMGNJGANOJEPIEMICDAA.bertilow@hem.passagen.se>
    Subject: RE: Better browsing
    
    James Pickering: 
    
    > >  I know damn well that Netscape 4.* has an annoying "burp" when it
    > >  encounters a meta tag charset specification, that its implementation of
    > >  CSS1 is screwy, and that it's ignorant of CSS2 <snip> 
    
    > ...... and those are its good points!
    
    > <snip> it wants to encourage
    > >  web-writers to tell would-be visitors with old browsers to buzz off, I
    > >  say to hell with WaSP.
    
    > Ah, still the old gadfly, Peter!  :-)
    
    > But I would like to put in a plug for an excellent (and free) People with 
    > Disabilities oriented Browser -- MultiWeb. I extoll its virtues 
    > and explain it further at: 
    
    > http://www.brazilcacticult.org/wf4.htm
    
    It doesn't say if MultiWeb handles the disability that consists in using
    a non-Western language, like Russian or Japanese. Does it? Probably not
    
    What happens when someone tries to access a WaSP-ified page with one
    of the browsers targeted at disabled users, e.g. the blind? Will they
    be sent to the WASP-site and told to upgrade to a browser they couldn't
    even use?
    
    #####################################################################
                              Bertilo Wennergren
                      <http://purl.oclc.org/net/bertilo>
                             <bertilow@chello.se>
    #####################################################################