Re: depreciated tags

From: chajadan (chajadan@starroute.com)
Date: Wed, Feb 21 2001

Next message: JAMESICUS@aol.com: "Better browsing"

Previous message: chajadan: "Re: Another common problem to include in the FAQ?"
In reply to: antilyrical@spamcop.net: "depreciated tags"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Message-ID: <004101c09c6e$fa0a79a0$54efa284@oberlin.edu>
From: "chajadan" <chajadan@starroute.com>
To: <www-validator@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 17:29:41 -0800
Subject: Re: depreciated tags


I FULLY agree with this! The CSS vaildator gives warnings so it's completely
a been-there-done-that kinda deal. I would love the to see that added to the
general validator!
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: antilyrical@spamcop.net
  To: www-validator@w3.org
  Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 3:53 AM
  Subject: depreciated tags


        Hello!
        I think modifications should be made so that whoever submitted the
web page, gets a warning if they use a depreciated tag. For example, if
someone has the <strike> tag in their document, when it gets parsed by
validator, it will give a warning saying that the <strike> tag is
depreciated.
        I don't know how possible and/or probable that change would be, but
I think it would be a great addition to validator.

        Mario


        Stamp powered by www.mailround.com

Next message: JAMESICUS@aol.com: "Better browsing"
Previous message: chajadan: "Re: Another common problem to include in the FAQ?"
In reply to: antilyrical@spamcop.net: "depreciated tags"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]