Validating RDDL

From: Aaron Swartz (aswartz@upclink.com)
Date: Mon, Feb 12 2001

Next message: Shane P. McCarron: "Re: Validating RDDL"

Previous message: Tim Bagot: "Re: Validator should not be interpreting <SCRIPT> tag contents atall"
Next in thread: Shane P. McCarron: "Re: Validating RDDL"
Reply: Shane P. McCarron: "Re: Validating RDDL"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 22:59:59 -0600
From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
To: <www-validator@w3.org>
CC: XML-DEV <xml-dev@xml.org>
Message-ID: <B6AE1B6F.2276B%aswartz@upclink.com>
Subject: Validating RDDL

It seems that the W3C HTML validator has some trouble validating RDDL files:

First, it does not follow 300 redirects, and thus can't grab the RDDL DTD.

Second, when it does grab the DTD it seems to go into some infinite loop and
puts out the XHTML namespace 100 times.

Otherwise, it actually seems to validate things correctly. Good work!

Thanks,
-- 
Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>|       The Info Network
  <http://www.aaronsw.com>   |     <http://theinfo.org>
AIM: JediOfPi | ICQ: 33158237| the way you want the web to be

Next message: Shane P. McCarron: "Re: Validating RDDL"
Previous message: Tim Bagot: "Re: Validator should not be interpreting <SCRIPT> tag contents atall"
Next in thread: Shane P. McCarron: "Re: Validating RDDL"
Reply: Shane P. McCarron: "Re: Validating RDDL"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]