- From: James Ralston <qralston+ml.www-validator@andrew.cmu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 13:28:04 -0500 (EST)
- To: Lloyd Wood <l.wood@eim.surrey.ac.uk>
- cc: webmaster <webmaster@domovina.net>, www-validator <www-validator@w3.org>, Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Lloyd Wood wrote: > > <!-- > > W3C validation service <http://validator.w3.org/> results > > Valid XHTML 1.1 as of 2001-12-16 17:34:00-04 > > --> > > nice idea - but nest <> in comments? urgh. I just threw a quick example together; I didn't say it was the optimal thing to do. If you have a better suggestion, throw it out. > and who reads comments anyway? The authors, of course! That's why the validation information should go in the comments (or someplace else where the clients won't see): clients don't *care* about that information. -- James Ralston, Information Technology Software Engineering Institute Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Received on Thursday, 20 December 2001 13:28:17 UTC