W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > August 2001

Re: Error reporting (Re: Error numbering)

From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 07:16:06 +0200
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
cc: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>, www-validator@w3.org
Message-ID: <20010807073952-r01010700-1899b86c-0910-010c@192.168.1.6>
On 07.08.01 at 02:30, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote:

>* Nick Kew wrote:
>>>Because OL is visually noisy and I'm not entirely convinced it would be
>>>a win. OTOH, I'm not entirely convinced a list is the proper form for
>>>the output so YMMV. :-)
>>
>>I agree: I don't really like list.
>
>I'm very curious to know how you mark up a ordered list of errors in
>HTML. _I_ thought the "ordered list" element (mnemonic 'ol') would be
>appropriate but maybe this solution is too obvious to be correct...

That one way is correct does not preclude another from _also_ being
correct. In particular, in this case, I feel uncomfortable with the use of
'ol' for this. I'm not really sure why yet, but I'm guessing it has
something to do with the fact that there is more list items, and more data
per list item, then I would normally consider to be a list.

Truth be told, I'm leaning in the direction of a 'table', but I worry that
will have performance implications.
Received on Thursday, 9 August 2001 06:16:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:13:59 GMT