Re: Icons for XHTML1.1

From: hunter (hunter@userfriendly.net)
Date: Sat, Jun 30 2001

  • Next message: hunter: "Re: Icons for XHTML1.1"

    Message-ID: <3B3E33E4.77FB896A@userfriendly.net>
    Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 16:17:40 -0400
    From: hunter <hunter@userfriendly.net>
    To: Ken Cotterill <ken@me.com.au>
    CC: JAMESICUS@aol.com, www-validator@w3.org
    Subject: Re: Icons for XHTML1.1
    
    
    i disagree, what it says is, that it found NO errors, it doesnt say it
    found no errors when validating against a KNOWN namespace....
    
    ...if its not in w3c's namespace for validation, then the button and
    citation are worthless IMHO
    -- 
    Michael B. Weiner, Linux+, Linux+ SME
    Systems Administrator/Partner
    The UserFriendly Network (UFN)
    --
    Linux Registered User #94900	Have you been counted?
    http://counter.li.org
    
    PGP: 30 1D CC BA 30 30 63 35  CD 58 E0 89 A9 17 CC C0  8C 55 F7 72
    
    .........    Escape the 'Gates' of Hell
      `:::'                  .......  ......
       :::  *                  `::.    ::'
       ::: .::  .:.::.  .:: .::  `::. :'
       :::  ::   ::  ::  ::  ::    :::.
       ::: .::. .::  ::.  `::::. .:'  ::.
    ...:::.....................::'   .::::..
    --