Next message: hunter: "Re: Icons for XHTML1.1"
Message-ID: <3B3E3371.E88DA20D@userfriendly.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 16:15:45 -0400
From: hunter <hunter@userfriendly.net>
To: JAMESICUS@aol.com
CC: www-validator@w3.org, Ken Cotterill <ken@me.com.au>
Subject: Re: Icons for XHTML1.1
bottom line is, its NOT validated against a DTD which isnt in the
namespace yet, cant be...thats the way it works...so that validation
means next to nothing IMHO
HTH
--
JAMESICUS@aol.com wrote:
>
> In a message dated 6/30/01 7:05:22 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
> ken@me.com.au wrote:
>
> > Go to http://ken.me.com.au/v3.html and click on the validation button at
> the
> > bottom. <snip>
>
> Well, I am confused. The Validation you cite, Ken, contains the following
> caveat:
>
> Document type: unknown with namespace http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml
>
> I don't see how that signifies that your Document was Validated as XHTML 1.1.
> Could anyone explain this, please?
>
> James Pickering
> Tucson, Arizona
--
Michael B. Weiner, Linux+, Linux+ SME
Systems Administrator/Partner
The UserFriendly Network (UFN)
--
Linux Registered User #94900 Have you been counted?
http://counter.li.org
PGP: 30 1D CC BA 30 30 63 35 CD 58 E0 89 A9 17 CC C0 8C 55 F7 72
......... Escape the 'Gates' of Hell
`:::' ....... ......
::: * `::. ::'
::: .:: .:.::. .:: .:: `::. :'
::: :: :: :: :: :: :::.
::: .::. .:: ::. `::::. .:' ::.
...:::.....................::' .::::..
--