Next message: hunter: "Re: Icons for XHTML1.1"
Message-ID: <003001c1019c$b6b7a860$10a711cb@deimos>
From: "Ken Cotterill" <ken@me.com.au>
To: <JAMESICUS@aol.com>, <www-validator@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 05:41:52 +1000
Subject: Re: Icons for XHTML1.1
James,
Yep, you're right.
It first says it's unknown (as you have below), then it says:
Below are the results of checking this document for XML well-formedness and validity.
No errors found! *
Congratulations, this document validates as the document type specified! (I don't have an icon for this one yet, sorry.)
I added a lang="en" to the HTML tag.
It reports this is not a valid attribute.
So it appears to be correctly discerning between XHTML 1.0 Strict and XHTML 1.1
I ran it through http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/ which reported:
a.. Level of HTML: XHTML 1.1
Congratulations, no errors!
The namespace is as cited by W3C.
This suggests the validation is working correctly and the namespace recognition code has a problem.
That's about as far as I can run with this.
Regards,
Ken.
----- Original Message -----
From: JAMESICUS@aol.com
To: www-validator@w3.org
Cc: Ken Cotterill
Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2001 5:01 AM
Subject: Re: Icons for XHTML1.1
In a message dated 6/30/01 7:05:22 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
ken@me.com.au wrote:
> Go to http://ken.me.com.au/v3.html and click on the validation button at
the
> bottom. <snip>
Well, I am confused. The Validation you cite, Ken, contains the following
caveat:
Document type: unknown with namespace http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml
I don't see how that signifies that your Document was Validated as XHTML 1.1.
Could anyone explain this, please?
James Pickering
Tucson, Arizona