Re: German_Umlauts

From: Lloyd Wood (l.wood@eim.surrey.ac.uk)
Date: Sat, Jun 30 2001

  • Next message: JAMESICUS@aol.com: "Re: Icons for XHTML1.1"

    Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 17:11:28 +0100 (BST)
    From: Lloyd Wood <l.wood@eim.surrey.ac.uk>
    To: Liam Quinn <liam@htmlhelp.com>
    cc: Rainer Ziener <ziener@tls-tautenburg.de>, www-validator <www-validator@w3.org>, mrengel <mrengel@tls-tautenburg.de>
    Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0106301709190.27030-100000@phaestos.ee.surrey.ac.uk>
    Subject: Re: German_Umlauts
    
    On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Liam Quinn wrote:
    
    > There's nothing wrong with using the 8-bit ISO-8859-1 encoding of a letter
    > with an umlaut as long as you specify your charset as ISO-8859-1. 
    
    but if you can, surely using available &entity; increases
    understandability for displays using other charsets? Even if they
    don't translate it but display it raw, the reader has a chance to
    figure out meaning.
    
    L.
    
    has been seeing a lot of &emdash; recently, as hundreds of years of
    typographic crud catch up with the web.
    
    <L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk>PGP<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/>