Re: Producing an XML report from the validator

From: Kynn Bartlett (kynn@idyllmtn.com)
Date: Wed, Jun 13 2001

  • Next message: Terje Bless: "Re: Producing an XML report from the validator"

    Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20010613101217.00c95340@garth.idyllmtn.com>
    Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 10:14:07 -0700
    To: Terje Bless <link@tss.no>
    From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
    Cc: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>, Christian Smith <csmith@barebones.com>, Esmond Walshe <esmond.walshe@eeng.dcu.ie>, www-validator@w3.org
    Subject: Re: Producing an XML report from the validator
    
    At 10:11 AM 6/13/2001 , Terje Bless wrote:
    >However, EARL looks to be a bit immature yet; not to mention utter overkill
    >for this purpose. Once I grok Notation3 I'll take another look. :-)
    
    Well, it's probably overkill for -this- purpose, but when you consider
    the ability to combine a number of purposes using a common framework,
    it makes a lot of sense.
    
    Now, mind you, I barely grok RDF myself and Notation3 is beyond me.  I
    support EARL in theory, but in practice I suspect I am more lost than
    you. ;)  But the theory is good, and there are brilliant people
    working on this, so I am all for further development of EARL and I don't
    feel bad in trying to proselytize for its use!
    
    --Kynn
    
    -- 
    Kynn Bartlett  <kynn@idyllmtn.com>                http://kynn.com/
    Technical Developer Liaison, Reef             http://www.reef.com/
    Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain Internet   http://idyllmtn.com/
    Online Instructor, Accessible Web Design     http://kynn.com/+d201