Re: xhtml+javascript. bug?

From: Clemens Radl (clemens.radl@uni-tuebingen.de)
Date: Mon, Jun 11 2001

Next message: Peter K. Sheerin: "Re: xhtml+javascript. bug?"

Previous message: Liam Quinn: "Re: xhtml+javascript. bug?"
In reply to: Kai Duebbert: "xhtml+javascript. bug?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 00:22:17 +0200 (CEST)
From: Clemens Radl <clemens.radl@uni-tuebingen.de>
To: Kai Duebbert <kai@duebbert.de>
cc: www-validator@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0106120017160.28691-100000@hsmau1.histo.geschichtswissenschaft.uni-tuebingen.>
Subject: Re: xhtml+javascript. bug?

Hi,

> Everything validates fine until the javascript (for thecounter.com, which I 
> changed to make most of it xhtml valid) starts.

If you put your script into a CDATA-section, your document validates
perfectly well.

See <http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xhtml1-20000126/#h-4.8> for more
details.

Best wishes,

Clemens

--
Clemens Radl
Universitaet Tuebingen
Abteilung fuer mittelalterliche Geschichte
http://www.uni-tuebingen.de/mittelalter/

Next message: Peter K. Sheerin: "Re: xhtml+javascript. bug?"
Previous message: Liam Quinn: "Re: xhtml+javascript. bug?"
In reply to: Kai Duebbert: "xhtml+javascript. bug?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]