Next message: jason r tibbetts: "Re: Flagging & in URL in HTML 4.01 transitional type."
Message-ID: <012001c0f03d$ca9e09c0$88b5fea9@birkebertilo>
From: "Bertilo Wennergren" <bertilow@bertilo.se.fm>
To: <www-validator@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 19:07:34 +0200
Subject: Re: Missing Support for XHTML Basic and XHTML 1.1
Christian Wolfgang Hujer:
> your validator currently does not recognize your new standards XHTML Basic
> and XHTML 1.1. It would be very nice to have symbols and document type
> recognition for them.
To this might be added that the page <http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/>
still claims that:
"XHTML 1.0 is W3C's Recommendation for the latest version of HTML"
But on the same page the following is also found:
31 May 2001: W3C is pleased to announce the publication of XHTML 1.1 -
Module-based XHTML as a W3C Recommendation,
Is this just an oversight, or is XHTML 1.0 still the current W3C
recommendation for HTML? If so, then what is XHTML 1.1?
--
#################################################################
Bertil Wennergren
PrimeNet
<bertil@primenet.se>
#################################################################