Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML

• From: Karl Ove Hufthammer <huftis@bigfoot.com>
• Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 19:08:15 +0200
• To: "www-validator" <www-validator@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <005701c0e53d$4dd8e640$6f349fc3@huftis>

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lloyd Wood" <l.wood@eim.surrey.ac.uk>
To: "Kynn Bartlett" <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
Cc: "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net>; "JohnTNYC" <johntnyc@yahoo.com>;
"www-validator" <www-validator@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML

> lynx will complain 'bad HTML!'

But only if it's *really* bad.

> Netscape will show some really bad errors as coloured text in View
> Source; if it had a more visual indication without requiring viewing
> source, the world would be a better place.

See <URL: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6211 > and <URL:
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47108 >.

-- 
Karl Ove Hufthammer

Received on Friday, 25 May 2001 13:08:49 UTC