Re: HTML Validator

From: Einar Westermann (einar.westermann@trygdeetaten.no)
Date: Thu, May 24 2001

Next message: Lloyd Wood: "Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML"

Previous message: Sofia Lauffs: "Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML"
In reply to: JMWhitmire@aol.com: "HTML Validator"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 07:09:06 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3B0CEB93.62100DD5@trygdeetaten.no>
From: Einar Westermann <einar.westermann@trygdeetaten.no>
To: JMWhitmire@aol.com, www-validator@w3.org
Subject: Re: HTML Validator

Try refreshing the page.

JMWhitmire@aol.com wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the service.  One problem I had was that after I clicked on the
> 'explanation' link and read the text there, I couldn't go back to the
> validator results; I always got a message that the page had expired.  (I had
> used the upload option.)

Next message: Lloyd Wood: "Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML"
Previous message: Sofia Lauffs: "Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML"
In reply to: JMWhitmire@aol.com: "HTML Validator"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]