Re: Reissuing 'Character Set' Note? Re: Betterinternationalization of validator

From: Dan Connolly (connolly@w3.org)
Date: Thu, May 24 2001

  • Next message: Masayasu Ishikawa: "Re: Better internationalization of validator"

    Message-ID: <3B0C87A0.E675C05B@w3.org>
    Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 23:01:36 -0500
    From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
    To: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
    CC: Terje Bless <link@tss.no>, Gerald Oskoboiny <gerald@w3.org>, W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>
    Subject: Re: Reissuing 'Character Set' Note? Re: Betterinternationalization of   validator
    
    Martin Duerst wrote:
    > 
    > At 05:00 01/05/22 +0200, Terje Bless wrote:
    > >On 22.05.01 at 10:27, Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org> wrote:
    > 
    > [discussing http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/html-spec/charset-harmful]
    > 
    [...]
    > >I'd suggest you reissue it as a W3C Note only and remove the Expiration
    > >date (and fix the formatting to match W3C style guide) if it's not intended
    > >to expire.
    > 
    > Dan, do you want to do that? Do you think it's necessary?
    > I certainly think that your Note is still very valuable.
    
    Well, a few of the details are a little goofy, and I'm
    pretty sure it's subsumed by the I18N WG's charmod spec.
    
    So I'm not sure it's worthwhile.
    
    In fact, the thing to do might be to update it to say
    "obsoleted by the charmod spec".
    
    On the other hand, I've written the terms up formally
    a couple times... once back in 1996
    
      http://www.w3.org/Architecture/theory/Character.lsl
    
    and again more recently in a sort of RDF logic...
    
      http://www.w3.org/2001/03swell/charmod.n3
    
    I hope to develop an integrated suite of formalizations
    of URIs, XML, HTTP (including MIME).
    
    Hmm...
    
    -- 
    Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/