Re: The "iso-8859-8-i" encoding

On 06.04.01 at 12:40, Udi Wertheimer <ticker@newmail.net> wrote:

>Oh my. There is no such thing as "iso-8859-i" I afraid. I'll read my
>messages twice next time :) So what I meant was that "iso-8859-8-i" is
>identical to "iso-8859-8", and so, "iso-8859-8-i" should be treated as an
>alias for "iso-8859-8".

Ok. I'll keep it in mind for the next update. Thanks for bringing attention
to this issue.

Received on Saturday, 7 April 2001 04:45:24 UTC