Re: broken html from checklink?

From: Hugo Haas (hugo@w3.org)
Date: Wed, Apr 04 2001

Next message: Terje Bless: "Re: Sixteen Bit Fonts"

Previous message: Peter Foti (PeterF): "Specifying the Document type in the validator instead of in the p age"
In reply to: Charles Williams: "broken html from checklink?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 15:19:38 -0400
From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
To: Charles Williams <C.D.H.Williams@exeter.ac.uk>
Cc: www-validator@w3.org
Message-ID: <20010404151938.F4037@jibboom.w3.org>
Subject: Re: broken html from checklink?

* Charles Williams <C.D.H.Williams@exeter.ac.uk> [2001-03-28 13:16-0500]
> The reports returned from http://validator.w3.org/ seem to have a 
> missing </h2> tag.

I have fixed that: that was a bad test in the summary-only mode.

Thanks.

-- 
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/ - tel:+1-617-452-2092

Next message: Terje Bless: "Re: Sixteen Bit Fonts"
Previous message: Peter Foti (PeterF): "Specifying the Document type in the validator instead of in the p age"
In reply to: Charles Williams: "broken html from checklink?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]