W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > June 2000

RE: XHTML validation

From: Bertilo Wennergren <bertilow@hem.passagen.se>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 13:53:31 +0200
To: <JAMESICUS@aol.com>, <www-validator@w3.org>
Message-ID: <NEBBLKKAILEODMBLCACDOEAPCBAA.bertilow@hem.passagen.se>
James Pickering:

> http://www.concinnity.se/bertilow/div/mad.html

> http://www.concinnity.se/bertilow/div/testform.htm

> [...]

> What really surprised me was that both of your files passed muster 
> ("Congratulations" , etc.) when I ran them in  XML.com's  RUWF 
> (are you well  formed) XML Syntax Checker:

Well, they are well-formed (I believe). The second one should be
valid too, although it's hard to be sure, since there are no
validators to check them with.

#####################################################################
                          Bertilo Wennergren
                  <http://purl.oclc.org/net/bertilo>
                      <bertilow@hem.passagen.se>
#####################################################################
Received on Tuesday, 13 June 2000 07:54:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 25 April 2012 12:13:54 GMT