Re: 4.0 to 4.01 Transition Issues

From: Ann Navarro (ann@webgeek.com)
Date: Tue, Feb 15 2000

Next message: David Lindquist: "Validator bookmarklet"
Previous message: Terje Bless: "Re: 4.0 to 4.01 Transition Issues"
In reply to: Christian Smith: "Re: 4.0 to 4.01 Transition Issues"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Message-Id: <4.1.20000215094833.06805580@216.65.70.29>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 09:50:07 -0500
To: Christian Smith <csmith@barebones.com>
From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
Cc: W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>
Subject: Re: 4.0 to 4.01 Transition Issues

At 11:32 PM 2/14/00 -0500, Christian Smith wrote:

>Nah, I think this is perfect. It lets the user know immediately that they
>should be using something other than what they are using, points to the
>current version and also points to the full content of the previous
>version.

No, it's perfectly legitimate to still use HTML 4.0 (just as it is to use
HTML 3.2, or HTML 2.0). These don't die or become subsumed by new versions. 

Ann
---
Just Released! - HTML BY Example
Now shipping -  Mastering XML 
Also in print:  Effective Web Design: Master the Essentials

Founder, WebGeek Communications            http://www.webgeek.com
Vice President-Finance, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org
Director, HWG Online Education             http://www.hwg.org/services/classes

Next message: David Lindquist: "Validator bookmarklet"
Previous message: Terje Bless: "Re: 4.0 to 4.01 Transition Issues"
In reply to: Christian Smith: "Re: 4.0 to 4.01 Transition Issues"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]