Re: validator bug ?

From: Claus Färber (list-w3c-html-validator@faerber.muc.de)
Date: Sat, Jan 29 2000

Next message: Leedsnet: "Re: Explicitly closing implicitly opened elements"
Previous message: Terje Bless: "Re: New end tags?"
In reply to: Braverman, David: "Re: validator bug ?"
Next in thread: Harold A. Driscoll: "Re: validator bug ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Date: 29 Jan 2000 14:17:00 +0100
From: list-w3c-html-validator@faerber.muc.de (Claus Färber)
To: www-validator@w3.org
Message-ID: <7XlGE643cDB@faerber.muc.de>
Subject: Re: validator bug ?

Braverman, David <DBraverman@ingprime.com> schrieb/wrote:
> Ah, so if your server doesn't support ";", then you're stuck with a minor
> flaw in your HTML code. Does anyone know which HTTP servers support the
> correct code?

The servers don't have to. They pass the full query string to the CGI  
programme.

-- 
Claus Andre Faerber <http://www.faerber.muc.de>
PGP: ID=1024/527CADCD FP=12 20 49 F3 E1 04 9E 9E  25 56 69 A5 C6 A0 C9 DC

Next message: Leedsnet: "Re: Explicitly closing implicitly opened elements"
Previous message: Terje Bless: "Re: New end tags?"
In reply to: Braverman, David: "Re: validator bug ?"
Next in thread: Harold A. Driscoll: "Re: validator bug ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]