Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?

Terje Bless wrote:

> And since Liam is too modest to say it himself: the WDG Validator _is_
> better then the W3C one! Fairly significantly too.

Then why don't Liam and W3C do a trade -- the W3C site gets his validator, and
he gets credited there.

--
http://www.urielw.com/

Received on Wednesday, 22 September 1999 12:04:13 UTC