RE: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?

> And since Liam is too modest to say it himself: the WDG Validator _is_
> better then the W3C one! Fairly significantly too.

Hmm... WDG's validator doesn't seem to have support for XHTML:
http://www.htmlhelp.com/cgi-bin/validate.cgi?url=http://www.gigabee.com&input=yes

Gives me a bunch of errors which I'm assuming are only there because
it wasn't able to detect XHTML there.

-- 
Bart Szyszka  bart@gigabee.com  ICQ:4982727
B Grafyx  http://www.bgrafyx.com
** Good deal for magazine subscriptions/renewals while helping my school:
http://www.gigabee.com/magazines/ 

Received on Thursday, 23 September 1999 04:40:45 UTC