Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?

From: Liam Quinn (liam@htmlhelp.com)
Date: Thu, Sep 23 1999


Message-ID: <37E9AB99.A4C276BC@htmlhelp.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 00:24:57 -0400
From: Liam Quinn <liam@htmlhelp.com>
To: bart@gigabee.com
CC: www-validator@w3.org
Subject: Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?

"B. Szyszka" wrote:
> 
> > And since Liam is too modest to say it himself: the WDG Validator _is_
> > better then the W3C one! Fairly significantly too.
> 
> Hmm... WDG's validator doesn't seem to have support for XHTML:
> http://www.htmlhelp.com/cgi-bin/validate.cgi?url=http://www.gigabee.com&input=yes
> 
> Gives me a bunch of errors which I'm assuming are only there because
> it wasn't able to detect XHTML there.

Right, sorry about that.  I just now added support for XHTML 1.0.

Enjoy,

-- 
Liam Quinn
A Real Validator for Windows, http://arealvalidator.com
Web Design Group, http://www.htmlhelp.com