Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?

From: Terje Bless (link@tss.no)
Date: Wed, Sep 22 1999


Message-Id: <199909221628.SAA20340@vals.intramed.rito.no>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 18:35:20 +0200
From: Terje Bless <link@tss.no>
To: Lloyd Wood <L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk>
cc: W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>
Subject: Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?

On 22.09.99 at 17:22, Lloyd Wood <L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk> wrote:

>On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Terje Bless wrote:
>
>>The issue is what the badge signifies. Compliance with a certain
>>standard or the use of a specific bit of software. The presense of the
>>W3C logo on the badge is incidental.
>
>and doesn't signify e.g. payment of W3C membership fees?

Uhm, no. Why? :-)

-- 
*** I just switched to a new email client.
*** If you see any format problems in this message, yell. Loudly! :-)

                                             -link