Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?

From: Terje Bless (link@tss.no)
Date: Wed, Sep 22 1999


Message-Id: <199909221625.SAA19389@vals.intramed.rito.no>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 18:22:43 +0200
From: Terje Bless <link@tss.no>
To: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
cc: Liam Quinn <liam@htmlhelp.com>, Uriel Wittenberg <uw@urielw.com>, www-validator@w3.org
Subject: Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?

On 22.09.99 at 11:45, Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com> wrote:

>>Exactly! If you pass one you should pass the other. Anything else is a
bug!
>
>Right, but the layperson has no way of judging that. 

Oh? They just use the same badges; that should be clear enough. :-)

-- 
*** I just switched to a new email client.
*** If you see any format problems in this message, yell. Loudly! :-)

                                             -link