Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?

From: Uriel Wittenberg (uw@urielw.com)
Date: Wed, Sep 22 1999


Message-ID: <37E8FDCF.25319AE5@urielw.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 12:03:27 -0400
From: Uriel Wittenberg <uw@urielw.com>
To: Terje Bless <link@tss.no>
CC: Liam Quinn <liam@htmlhelp.com>, Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>, www-validator@w3.org
Subject: Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?

Terje Bless wrote:

> And since Liam is too modest to say it himself: the WDG Validator _is_
> better then the W3C one! Fairly significantly too.

Then why don't Liam and W3C do a trade -- the W3C site gets his validator, and
he gets credited there.

--
http://www.urielw.com/