- From: Uriel Wittenberg <uw@urielw.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 00:24:54 -0400
- To: Terje Bless <link@tss.no>
- CC: W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>
Terje Bless wrote: > On 21.09.99 at 17:45, Uriel Wittenberg <uw@urielw.com> wrote: > > >Liam Quinn insists I am entitled to display the W3C "valid HTML" logo > >based on validation at http://www.htmlhelp.com. Is this true? > > I'm not sure what the W3C thinks of it, but AFAIK the icon is meant to > signify that the page in question has been validated to conform with the > relevant standard. The reason for the "W3C" is just that the relevant > standards are from the W3C. Also, both validators should give the same > result; if it validates with one it will validate with the other If I could assume that there'd be no issue. As I read the W3C website, their permission to display their logo depends on use of _their_ validator. Do they endorse others? -- http://www.urielw.com/
Received on Wednesday, 22 September 1999 00:25:33 UTC