Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?

From: Uriel Wittenberg (uw@urielw.com)
Date: Wed, Sep 22 1999


Message-ID: <37E858C5.3CE623BC@urielw.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 00:19:18 -0400
From: Uriel Wittenberg <uw@urielw.com>
To: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
CC: www-validator@w3.org
Subject: Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?

Kynn Bartlett wrote:

> At 05:45 p.m. 09/21/99 -0400, Uriel Wittenberg wrote:
> >Liam Quinn insists I am entitled to display the W3C "valid HTML" logo
> >based on validation at http://www.htmlhelp.com. Is this true?
>
> Well, is it valid HTML?  If so, then it shouldn't really matter, should
> it?
>

You mean, if I know it's valid I can display the W3C logo without bothering
with the validators?

--
http://www.urielw.com/