Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?

From: Kynn Bartlett (kynn@idyllmtn.com)
Date: Tue, Sep 21 1999


Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990921205812.009b9ad0@mail.idyllmtn.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 20:58:12 -0500
To: Uriel Wittenberg <uw@urielw.com>
From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
Cc: www-validator@w3.org
Subject: Re: OK to display W3C logo based on 3'rd party validator?

At 05:45 p.m. 09/21/99 -0400, Uriel Wittenberg wrote:
>Liam Quinn insists I am entitled to display the W3C "valid HTML" logo
>based on validation at http://www.htmlhelp.com. Is this true?

Well, is it valid HTML?  If so, then it shouldn't really matter, should
it?

--
Kynn Bartlett  <kynn@idyllmtn.com>                   http://www.kynn.com/
Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain Internet      http://www.idyllmtn.com/
Catch the web accessibility meme!                   http://aware.hwg.org/