- From: Chris Nappin <CNappin@inri.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 09:24:58 +0100
- To: "Philip J. Bailey" <pjb@philipbailey.u-net.com>
- CC: "validator (email list)" <www-validator@w3.org>
"Philip J. Bailey" wrote: > That brings me back to my original problem, what DTD declaration should you > use when you know it will not validate. See http://validator.w3.org/sgml-lib/catalog for a list of DTDs supported by the W3C validation service. There are some Microsoft and Netscape specific DTDs - although I have never used them. > ...Still untill the Microsoft and Netscape > declare an armistis, and all browsers fully support the all the standards, > what else can you do?... If using a Microsoft/Netscape extension is necessary (e.g. a customer has asked for it) then I would forget about validation. Just do your usual thorough testing. thanks, -- Chris Nappin, INRI UK Ltd. Tel: +44 (0)1703 760484 Fax: +44 (0)1703 760483 Web: www.inri.co.uk INRI is a subsidiary of Logicon Inc, a Northrop Grumman Company.
Received on Wednesday, 2 June 1999 05:03:42 UTC